Thanks for this wonderful opportunity to keep the Charlie Jade geeking alive.
Unfortunately, I think my biggest questions fall into an area Robert still doesn't want to discuss (judging from the episode commentaries), but here goes. I have always been very intrigued by the change in writing staff after episode 9. The tone definitely shifted, and while I appreciate that the scripts were tighter and more streamlined under the new staff, I did miss the dreamier, more allusive atmosphere of the early episodes. Sure, it was harder to follow and make sense of, less commercially viable, but immersing us in a disorienting and surreal atmosphere kind of made sense, given Charlie's situation.
Also, I finally watched the show after hearing Mike and Summer, et al.'s recommendations on Slice. They kept saying, "Hang on until the fifth episode, or so. After that, you really find out what's going on, it really picks up, etc." Now, I picked up on the parallel 'verses pretty quickly. Between the *-verse logos, Katie Grail's Cape Town/Cape City confusion and lack of Alphaverse ID, 01's disappearance, etc., I was tracking that part of the story early on. So, I was waiting for another big reveal as episode 4 and 5 approached. I thought I was seeing hints that rather than parallel -verses, we were seeing different points on the same timeline. Our present, the dystopian future, and the bucolic past that Vexcor hoped to mine creating the mother of all time loops and subsequent ensuing cataclysmic complications. (The autocratic regime in Gamma mulberry referred to I always took to be Vexcor's alien presence, whether in the past or a parallel -verse.) I even thought Charlie not recognizing Nelson Mandela was misdirection. In the future, once the corporations had taken over, history would have been rewritten and all references to potential beacons of freedom and liberation expunged.
Also, in one of his
interviews, Robert mentions he didn't want to do a time travel story. The fact that he specifically refutes it implies to me that the creative differences that led to the change centered on that issue. A case of the man doth protest too much. So, after that long-winded introduction, my questions are, "What can Robert tell us about the change in writing staff, in general, and, specifically, was there are a dispute over the nature of the three -verses?"
I'll probably think of more, but that's the one that's really intrigues me!